🚰
Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
Go to NHMRC's website
  • Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
  • Copyright
  • Table of updates
  • Contents
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Boxes
  • Introduction
    • Chapter 1: Introduction
      • 1.1 Guiding principles
      • 1.2 About the Guidelines
        • 1.2.1 Scope of the Guidelines
        • 1.2.2 Purpose of the Guidelines
        • 1.2.3 Structure of the Guidelines
      • 1.3 Water quality characteristics
        • 1.3.1 Introduction
        • 1.3.2 Health-based targets
        • 1.3.3 Microbial health-based targets
        • 1.3.4 Physical and chemical guideline values
        • 1.3.5 Radiological screening and reference values
      • 1.4 Community consultation
      • 1.5 Development of the Guidelines
        • 1.5.1 Acknowledgments
      • 1.6 Future revisions of the Guidelines
      • 1.7 References
  • Part 1: Management of Drinking Water Quality
    • Chapter 2: Framework for Management of Drinking Water Quality: overview
      • 2.1 A preventive strategy from catchment to consumer
      • 2.2 Structure of the Framework
      • 2.3 Benefits of the Framework
      • 2.4 The need for multi-agency involvement
      • 2.5 Applying the Framework
      • 2.6 Correlations of the Framework with other systems
    • Chapter 3: Framework for Management of Drinking Water Quality: the twelve elements
      • 3.1 Commitment to drinking water quality management (element 1)
        • 3.1.1 Drinking water quality policy
        • 3.1.2 Regulatory and formal requirements
        • 3.1.3 Engaging stakeholders
      • 3.2 Assessment of the drinking water supply system (element 2)
        • 3.2.1 Water supply system analysis
        • 3.2.2 Assessment of water quality data
        • 3.2.3 Hazard identification and risk assessment
      • 3.3 Preventive measures for drinking water quality management (element 3)
        • 3.3.1 Preventive measures and multiple barriers
        • 3.3.2 Critical control points
      • 3.4 Operational procedures and process control (element 4)
        • 3.4.1 Operational procedures
        • 3.4.2 Operational monitoring
        • 3.4.3 Corrective action
        • 3.4.4 Equipment capability and maintenance
        • 3.4.5 Materials and chemicals
      • 3.5 Verification of drinking water quality (element 5)
        • 3.5.1 Drinking water quality monitoring
        • 3.5.2 Consumer satisfaction
        • 3.5.3 Short-term evaluation of results
        • 3.5.4 Corrective action
      • 3.6 Management of incidents and emergencies (element 6)
        • 3.6.1 Communication
        • 3.6.2 Incident and emergency response protocols
      • 3.7 Employee awareness and training (element 7)
        • 3.7.1 Employee awareness and involvement
        • 3.7.2 Employee training
      • 3.8 Community involvement and awareness (element 8)
        • 3.8.1 Community consultation
        • 3.8.2 Communication
      • 3.9 Research and development (element 9)
        • 3.9.1 Investigative studies and research monitoring
        • 3.9.2 Validation of processes
        • 3.9.3 Design of equipment
      • 3.10 Documentation and reporting (element 10)
        • 3.10.1 Management of documentation and records
        • 3.10.2 Reporting
      • 3.11 Evaluation and audit (element 11)
        • 3.11.1 Long-term evaluation of results
        • 3.11.2 Audit of drinking water quality management
      • 3.12 Review and continual improvement (element 12)
        • 3.12.1 Review by senior executive
        • 3.12.2 Drinking water quality management improvement plan
      • 3.13 References
    • Chapter 4: Framework for the Management of Drinking Water Quality: application to small water supplies
      • 4.1 Introduction
      • 4.2 Applying the Framework
        • 4.2.1 Assessment of the drinking water supply
        • 4.2.2 Preventive measures for drinking water quality management
        • 4.2.3 Implementation of operational procedures and process control
        • 4.2.4 Verification of drinking water quality
      • 4.3 Individual household supplies
      • 4.4 Reference
  • Part 2: Description of Water Quality
    • Chapter 5: Microbial Quality of Drinking Water (Updated 2022)
      • 5.1 Introduction
      • 5.2 Microorganisms in drinking water
      • 5.3 Assessing microbial risk
      • 5.4 Enteric pathogens
        • 5.4.1 Enteric pathogens of concern in drinking water
        • 5.4.2 Contamination of source waters with enteric pathogens
        • 5.4.3 Management of risk from enteric pathogens
      • 5.5 Opportunistic pathogens
      • 5.6 Cyanobacteria
      • 5.7 Nuisance organisms
        • 5.7.1 Organisms causing taste and odour problems
        • 5.7.2 Organisms causing colour problems
        • 5.7.3 Deposits due to iron and manganese bacteria
        • 5.7.4 Corrosion problems due to iron and sulphur bacteria
        • 5.7.5 Problems caused by large numbers of microorganisms
      • 5.8 References
    • Chapter 6: Physical and Chemical Quality of Drinking Water
      • 6.1 Introduction
      • 6.2 Physical quality of drinking water
        • 6.2.1 An overview of physical characteristics
        • 6.2.2 Approach used in derivation of guidelines values for physical characteristics
      • 6.3 Chemical quality of drinking water
        • 6.3.1 Inorganic chemicals
        • 6.3.2 Organic compounds (Revised 2011)
        • 6.3.3 Approach used in derivation of guideline values for chemicals
      • 6.4 Differences between Australian and WHO guideline values
      • 6.5 National and international guideline values (2016)
      • 6.6 References
    • Chapter 7: Radiological Quality of Drinking Water (Updated 2022)
      • 7.1 Introduction
      • 7.2 Sources of radiation in the environment and in drinking water
      • 7.3 Health effects of radiation
      • 7.4 Exposure to radiation
      • 7.5 Units of radioactivity and radiation dose measurement
        • 7.5.1 Units of radioactivity and radiation dose
        • 7.5.2 Converting intake to radiation dose
        • 7.5.3 Average dose of radiation
      • 7.6 Approach for derivation of reference levels and screening values for radionuclides
        • 7.6.1 System for radiation protection
        • 7.6.2 Estimation of the dose from radionuclides in water
        • 7.6.3 Estimation of risk from low-level radiation
        • 7.6.4 Reference levels and screening values for drinking water
        • 7.6.5 Application of reference levels
        • 7.6.6 Remedial measures
      • 7.7 References
    • Chapter 8: Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals (Revised 2006)
      • 8.1 Introduction
      • 8.2 Scope and limit of application of this chapter
      • 8.3 Overview of chemical treatment processes
        • 8.3.1 Control of algae
        • 8.3.2 Coagulation and flocculation
        • 8.3.3 Adsorption
        • 8.3.4 Softening
        • 8.3.5 Oxidation
        • 8.3.6 Disinfection
        • 8.3.7 Adjustment of pH
        • 8.3.8 Addition of buffering capacity
        • 8.3.9 Corrosion inhibition
      • 8.4 Public health measures
        • 8.4.1 Fluoridation
      • 8.5 Assessment of Chemicals acceptable for use in drinking water treatment (revised 2016)
        • 8.5.1 Chemicals assessed prior to 2004
        • 8.5.2 New water treatment chemicals
      • 8.6 Quality assurance for drinking water treatment chemicals
        • 8.6.1 Risks associated with drinking water chemicals
        • 8.6.2 Managing risks
        • 8.6.3 Specifications for the supply of drinking water treatment chemicals
      • 8.7 Monitoring and analytical requirements
      • 8.8 Contaminants in drinking water treatment chemicals
      • 8.9 Useful contacts
      • 8.10 References
  • Part 3: Monitoring
    • Chapter 9: Overview of monitoring (Revised 2021)
      • 9.1 Introduction
      • 9.2 Monitoring overview
        • 9.2.1 Monitoring priorities
        • 9.2.2 Principles of monitoring frequency
        • 9.2.3 Catchment-to-consumer monitoring
      • 9.3 Developing a monitoring program
      • 9.4 Operational monitoring
        • 9.4.1 Operational characteristics
        • 9.4.2 Target criteria
        • 9.4.3 Critical limits at critical control points
        • 9.4.4 Corrective action
        • 9.4.5 Operational monitoring frequency
        • 9.4.6 Chlorination as a critical control point: an example
      • 9.5 Verification of drinking water quality
        • 9.5.1 Monitoring consumer satisfaction
        • 9.5.2 Drinking water quality monitoring
      • 9.6 Water quality issues beyond the point of supply
      • 9.7 Investigative studies and research monitoring
      • 9.8 Validation of barrier performance
      • 9.9 Incident and emergency response monitoring
      • 9.10 Reliability of monitoring data
        • 9.10.1 Sample integrity
        • 9.10.2 Methods
        • 9.10.3 Detection limits
        • 9.10.4 Measurement uncertainty
        • 9.10.5 Field testing
      • 9.11 Monitoring advice for small, remote or community-managed water supplies
      • 9.12 Assessing the significance of short-term exceedances of health-based guideline values
      • 9.13 References
    • Chapter 10: Monitoring for specific characteristics in drinking water (Updated 2022)
      • 10.1 Introduction
      • 10.2 Assessing safety: short-term evaluation of monitoring
        • 10.2.1 Short-term evaluation of operational monitoring
        • 10.2.2 Short-term evaluation of drinking water quality monitoring
      • 10.3 Assessing performance: long-term evaluation of monitoring
        • 10.3.1 Long-term evaluation of microbial performance
        • 10.3.2 Long-term evaluation of health-based chemical performance
        • 10.3.3 Long-term evaluation of aesthetic performance
        • 10.3.4 Long-term evaluation of consumer satisfaction
        • 10.3.5 Improvement plan
        • 10.3.6 Performance reporting
        • 10.3.7 Summary of guideline values for microbial, chemical and physical characteristics
        • 10.3.8 Summary of reference levels and screening values for radiological characteristics
      • 10.4 Reference
  • Part 4: Information sheets
    • 1. Disinfection
      • 1.1: Introduction to water treatment
      • 1.2: Overview of disinfection
      • 1.3: Disinfection with chlorine
      • 1.4: Chloramines
      • 1.5: Disinfection with chlorine dioxide
      • 1.6: Disinfection with ozone
      • 1.7: Disinfection with ultraviolet light
      • 1.8: Other disinfectants
    • 2. Sampling
      • 2.1: Sampling Information – handling requirements and preservation
      • 2.2: Radiological monitoring and assessment of performance (updated 2022)
    • 3. Statistics
      • 3.1: Statistics – Visualising data
      • 3.2: Statistics – Assessing data
      • 3.3: Statistics – Statistical principles
      • 3.4: Statistics – Control charts and trends
      • 3.5: Number of samples required
      • 3.6: Guidance for issuing and lifting boil water advisories
      • Attachments
  • Part 5: Fact sheets
    • Microorganisms
      • Microbial indicators
        • Bacteroides
        • Coliphages
        • Clostridium perfringens
        • Escherichia coli
        • Heterotrophic plate counts
        • Intestinal enterococci
        • Thermotolerant coliforms
        • Total coliforms
      • Bacteria
        • Aeromonas
        • Burkholderia pseudomallei
        • Campylobacter
        • Escherichia coli (E. coli) (pathogenic)
        • Helicobacter pylori
        • Klebsiella
        • Legionella
        • Mycobacterium
        • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
        • Salmonella
        • Shigella
        • Vibrio
        • Yersinia
      • Protozoa
        • Acanthamoeba
        • Blastocystis
        • Cryptosporidium
        • Cyclospora
        • Giardia
        • Naegleria fowleri
      • Cyanobacteria and their toxins
        • Cyanobacteria and their toxins
        • Cylindrospermopsin
        • Microcystins
        • Nodularin
        • Saxitoxins
      • Viruses
        • Adenovirus
        • Enterovirus
        • Hepatitis viruses
        • Norovirus
        • Rotavirus
    • Physical and chemical characteristics
      • Acephate
      • Acrylamide
      • Aldicarb
      • Aldrin and Dieldrin
      • Aluminium
      • Ametryn
      • Amitraz
      • Amitrole
      • Ammonia
      • Antimony
      • Arsenic
      • Asbestos
      • Asulam
      • Atrazine
      • Azinphos-methyl
      • Barium
      • Benomyl
      • Bentazone
      • Benzene
      • Beryllium
      • Bioresmethrin
      • Boron
      • Bromacil
      • Bromate
      • Bromoxynil
      • Cadmium
      • Captan
      • Carbaryl
      • Carbendazim/Thiophanate-methyl
      • Carbofuran
      • Carbon tetrachloride
      • Carboxin
      • Carfentrazone-ethyl
      • Chloral hydrate (Trichloroacetaldehyde)
      • Chlorantraniliprole
      • Chlordane
      • Chlorfenvinphos
      • Chloride
      • Chlorinated furanones
      • Chlorine
      • Chlorine dioxide, Chlorite, Chlorate
      • Chloroacetic acids: chloroacetic acid, dichloroacetic acid (DCA), trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
      • Chlorobenzene
      • Chloroketones
      • Chlorophenols
      • Chloropicrin
      • Chlorothalonil
      • Chlorpyrifos
      • Chlorsulfuron
      • Chromium
      • Clopyralid
      • Colour (True)
      • Copper
      • Cyanide
      • Cyanogen chloride
      • Cyfluthrin, Beta-cyfluthrin
      • Cypermethrin isomers
      • Cyprodinil
      • 2,4-D [(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid]
      • DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-di-(4-chlorophenyl) ethane)
      • Deltamethrin
      • Diazinon
      • Dicamba
      • Dichlorobenzenes
      • Dichloroethanes: 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane
      • Dichloroethenes: 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), 1,2-dichloroethene (1,2-DCE)
      • Dichloromethane (methylene chloride)
      • 1,3-Dichloropropene
      • Dichlorprop/Dichlorprop-P
      • Dichlorvos
      • Diclofop-methyl
      • Dicofol
      • Diflubenzuron
      • Dimethoate
      • Diquat (ion), Diquat dibromide
      • Dissolved oxygen
      • Disulfoton
      • Diuron
      • 2,2-DPA
      • Endosulfan
      • Endothal
      • Epichlorohydrin
      • EPTC
      • Esfenvalerate
      • Ethion
      • Ethoprophos
      • Ethylbenzene
      • Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)
      • Etridiazole
      • Fenamiphos
      • Fenarimol
      • Fenchlorphos
      • Fenitrothion
      • Fenthion
      • Fenvalerate
      • Fipronil
      • Flamprop-methyl
      • Fluometuron
      • Fluoride
      • Flupropanate
      • Formaldehyde
      • Glyphosate
      • Haloacetonitriles
      • Haloxyfop
      • Hardness (as calcium carbonate)
      • Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide
      • Hexachlorobutadiene
      • Hexazinone
      • Hydrogen sulfide, Sulfide
      • Imazapyr
      • Iodine, Iodide
      • Iprodione
      • Iron
      • Lanthanum
      • Lead
      • Lindane
      • Maldison (Malathion)
      • Mancozeb
      • Manganese
      • MCPA
      • Mercury
      • Metaldehyde
      • Metham
      • Methidathion
      • Methiocarb
      • Methomyl
      • Methyl bromide
      • Metiram
      • Metolachlor/s-Metolachlor
      • Metribuzin
      • Metsulfuron-methyl
      • Mevinphos
      • Molinate
      • Molybdenum
      • Monochloramine
      • Naphthalophos
      • Napropamide
      • Nicarbazin
      • Nickel
      • Nitrate and nitrite
      • Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)
      • N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)
      • Norflurazon
      • Omethoate
      • Organotins: dialkyltins, tributyltin oxide
      • Oryzalin
      • Oxamyl
      • Paraquat
      • Parathion
      • Parathion-methyl
      • Pebulate
      • Pendimethalin
      • Pentachlorophenol
      • Per-fluoroalkyl and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
      • Permethrin
      • pH
      • Picloram
      • Piperonyl butoxide
      • Pirimicarb
      • Pirimiphos methyl
      • Plasticisers
      • Polihexanide
      • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
      • Profenofos
      • Promecarb
      • Propachlor
      • Propanil
      • Propargite
      • Propazine
      • Propiconazole
      • Propyzamide
      • Pyrasulfotole
      • Pyrazophos
      • Pyroxsulam
      • Quintozene
      • Radionuclides, Specific Alpha and Beta Emitting
      • Radium (radium-226 and radium-228)
      • Radon-222
      • Selenium
      • Silica
      • Silver
      • Simazine
      • Sodium
      • Spirotetramat
      • Styrene (vinylbenzene)
      • Sulfate
      • Sulprofos
      • Taste and Odour
      • Temephos
      • Temperature
      • Terbacil
      • Terbufos
      • Terbuthylazine
      • Terbutryn
      • Tetrachloroethene
      • Thiobencarb
      • Thiometon
      • Thiram
      • Tin
      • Toltrazuril
      • Toluene
      • Total dissolved solids
      • Triadimefon
      • Trichlorfon
      • Trichlorobenzenes
      • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
      • Trichloroethylene (TCE)
      • Triclopyr
      • Trifluralin
      • Trihalomethanes (THMs)
      • Turbidity
      • Uranium
      • Vernolate
      • Vinyl chloride
      • Xylenes
      • Zinc
    • Drinking water treatment chemicals
      • Aluminium chlorohydrate
      • Aluminium sulfate (alum)
      • Ammonia
      • Ammonium sulfate
      • Calcium hydroxide
      • Calcium hypochlorite
      • Calcium oxide
      • Carbon, granulated activated
      • Carbon, powdered activated
      • Chlorine
      • Copper sulfate
      • Ferric chloride
      • Ferric sulfate
      • Hydrochloric acid
      • Hydrofluorosilicic acid
      • Hydrogen peroxide
      • Hydroxylated ferric sulfate
      • Ozone
      • Polyacrylamide
      • Polyaluminium chloride
      • Polyaluminium silica sulfates
      • Polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride
      • Potassium permanganate
      • Sodium aluminate
      • Sodium bicarbonate
      • Sodium carbonate
      • Sodium fluoride
      • Sodium fluorosilicate
      • Sodium hexametaphosphate
      • Sodium hydroxide
      • Sodium hypochlorite
      • Sodium silicate
      • Sodium tripolyphosphate
      • Sulfuric acid
      • Zinc orthophosphate
  • Appendices
    • Appendix 1: Additional guidance
      • A1.1 Introduction
      • A1.2 Water supply system analysis
      • A1.3 Assessment of water quality data
      • A1.4 Hazard identification
      • A1.5 Risk assessment
      • A1.6 Preventive measures and multiple barriers
      • A1.7 Critical control points
      • A1.8 Chlorination as an example of a critical control point
      • A1.9 References
    • Appendix 2: Further sources of information on drinking water quality management
      • A2.1 Drinking water quality management - general
      • A2.2 Catchment management and source water protection
      • A2.3 Groundwater protection
      • A2.4 Risk assessment and management
      • A2.5 System analysis and management process control and optimisation
      • A2.6 Monitoring and verification
      • A2.7 Materials and chemicals
      • A2.8 Incident and emergency management
      • A2.9 Employee training and awareness
      • A2.10 Research and development
      • A2.11 Documentation and reporting
      • A2.12 Community consultation and communication
      • A2.13 Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP)
      • A2.14 Quality management continuous improvement
      • A2.15 Reference web sites
    • Appendix 3: Derivation of microbial treatment targets for enteric pathogens
      • A3.1 Introduction to Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA)
      • A3.2 Adopting the QMRA approach in the Guidelines
      • A3.3 QMRA framework for the calculation of log₁₀ reduction values (LRVs)
      • A3.4 Defining the health outcome target
      • A3.5 Selection of reference pathogens
      • A3.6 Level of reference pathogen contamination in Australian source waters
      • A3.7 Consumption volume of unheated (unboiled) water per person per day
      • A3.8 Dose response relationships
      • A3.9 Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) burden per case
      • A3.10 Calculation of LRVs using the QMRA framework
      • A3.11 Interpretation of calculated LRVs for practical treatment guidance
      • A3.12 Understanding log₁₀ reductions
      • A3.13 References
  • Glossary
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 6 2011, v3.9

  • Go back to NHMRC website
On this page
  • Guideline
  • General description
  • Australian significance
  • Treatment of drinking water
  • Method of identification and detection
  • Health considerations
  • Derivation of health alert
  • Notification procedure
  • References
  1. Part 5: Fact sheets
  2. Microorganisms
  3. Cyanobacteria and their toxins

Cylindrospermopsin

(endorsed 2011)

Guideline

Due to the lack of adequate data, no guideline value is set for concentrations of cylindrospermopsin. However given the known toxicity, the relevant health authority or drinking water regulator should be notified immediately if blooms of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii or other producers of cylindrospermopsin are detected in sources of drinking water.

General description

Cylindrospermopsin is tricyclic guanidine alkaloid cytotoxin with a molecular weight of 415, produced by the freshwater cyanobacteria Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Aphanizomenon ovalisporum, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, Raphidiopsis curvata, and Umezakia natans. There are two structural variants identified in addition to the most common form. It was first characterised and named from an Australian isolate of C. raciborskii (Ohtani et al. 1992). Subsequently cylindrospermopsin has been detected in two other cyanobacteria: Umezakia natans in Japan (Harada et al. 1994, Terao et al. 1994), and Aphanizomenon ovalisporum in Israel (Banker et al. 1997) and Australia (Shaw et al. 1999). In pure form, cylindrospermopsin is predominantly a hepatotoxin, although extracts of C. raciborskii administered to mice induced pathological symptoms in the kidneys, spleen, thymus, heart and eye. Two other structural variants of cylindrospermopsin have been identified (Banker et al. 2000, Norris et al. 1999).

The production of toxins and therefore the presence of toxicity in individual populations of some cyanobacterial species is known to be variable (Chorus and Bartram 1999 Chapter 3). In the case of C. raciborskii, however, the majority of the strains tested so far in Australia appear to produce cylindrospermopsin. It is therefore likely that most blooms of C. raciborskii will have some degree of toxicity. The natural breakdown of cylindrospermopsin in natural waters is influenced by a number of factors including previous occurrence. Degradation occurs within a few weeks in surface water subject to repeated occurrence, but is far slower in waters with no recorded history of occurrence (Chiswell et al. 1999, Smith et al. 2007).

Australian significance

Cylindrospermopsin is believed to have been the causative agent in the Palm Island “mystery disease” poisoning incident in Queensland in 1979, in which 148 people were hospitalised (Byth 1980). It was subsequently shown that water from Solomon Dam on Palm Island contained blooms of toxic C. raciborskii (Hawkins et al. 1985). C. raciborskii has been found in many water supply reservoirs in northern, central and southern Queensland. Although C. raciborskii and A. ovalisporum are both considered to be predominantly tropical/sub-tropical in terms of habitat, with most Australian blooms occurring in Queensland, C. raciborskii also occurs in the Murray-Darling River system (Baker and Humpage 1994). In recent years there has been increasing evidence of detection in the River Murray and C. raciborskii was detected in the major blooms that affected several hundred kilometres of the River Murray on the border between New South Wales and Victoria in 2009 and 2010 (NSW Office of Water 2009, MDBA 2010). C. raciborskii is not a scum-forming organism, but forms dense bands below the water surface in stratified lakes, while A. ovalisporum may form thick brown surface scums (Shaw et al. 1999). Although no reports of human poisoning attributable to cylindrospermopsin have appeared since the Palm Island incident, recent cattle deaths in Queensland are attributed to this toxin (Saker et al. 1999).

Treatment of drinking water

The first line of defence against cyanobacteria is catchment management to minimise nutrient inputs to source waters. Source water management techniques to control cyanobacterial growth include maintaining flow in regulated rivers; water mixing techniques, both to eliminate stratification and reduce nutrient release from sediments in reservoirs; and the use of algicides in dedicated water supply storages. Destratification has been used to attempt to reduce bloom intensities of C. raciborskii in reservoirs in Queensland, however it has not yet been possible to determine the efficacy of this treatment method. Caution is necessary in using algicides if a bloom has developed because these agents will disrupt cells and liberate intracellular cylindrospermopsin that could otherwise be removed by cell removal, as noted below. Once these intracellular toxins are released they are more difficult to manage. The extracellular release of cylindrospermopsin will increase when a developed bloom declines and algal cells lyse, reinforcing the need to prevent blooms as far as possible. Algicide use should be in accordance with local environment and chemical registration regulations. Where multiple intakes are available, withdrawing water selectively from different depths can minimise the intake of high accumulations of cyanobacterial cells at the surface.

The right combination of water treatment processes can be highly effective in removing both cyanobacterial cells and cylindrospermopsin. In contrast to other cyanotoxins, a high proportion of cylindrospermopsin in actively growing C. raciborskii blooms may be found free in the water, i.e. non cell-bound (Chiswell et al. 1999). Only the proportion of cylindrospermopsin that is cell-bound can be removed by coagulation and filtration in a conventional treatment plant (Chorus and Bartram 1999 Chapter 9). It should be noted that using oxidants such as chlorine or ozone to treat water containing cyanobacterial cells, while killing the cells, will also result in the release of free toxin; therefore pre-chlorination or pre-ozonation are not recommended without a subsequent step to remove dissolved toxins.

Cylindrospermopsin is readily oxidised by a range of oxidants including ozone and chlorine. Adequate contact time and pH control are needed to ensure optimum removal of these compounds, and this will be more difficult to achieve in the presence of whole cells (Chorus and Bartram 1999 Chapter 9). Cylindrospermopsin is also adsorbed from solution by both granular activated carbon and powdered activated carbon. Because powdered activated carbon may be a more practical option for intermittent or emergency use, it is important to seek advice and carefully select the most appropriate type for toxin removal, as carbons vary significantly in performance for different compounds. Boiling is not effective for the destruction of cylindrospermopsin. Based on current knowledge, the recommended best-practice treatment scheme for removal of cylindrospermopsin would include conventional treatment (coagulation/filtration) followed by an adsorption or oxidation step.

Method of identification and detection

Animal bioassays (mouse tests) have been used to determine the toxicity of C. raciborskii (Falconer et al. 1999, Seawright et al. 1999). These tests provide a definitive indication of toxicity, although they cannot be used for precise quantification of compounds in water. Instrumental analytical techniques are available for determining the presence of cylindrospermopsin in water, including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection (Harada et al. 1994) and HPLC-Mass Spectrometry (Eaglesham et al. 1999).

Cyanobacteria are detected by light microscopy, identified using morphological characteristics, and counted per standard volume of water (Hotzel and Croome 1999). Practical keys for the identification are provided in Baker and Fabbro (2002).

Health considerations

The major pathological effects of cylindrospermopsin are damage to the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, stomach, adrenal glands, the vascular system, and the lymphatic system (Falconer and Humpage 2006). Liver damage is likely to be severe and dose dependent. Cylindrospermopsin is a slow-acting toxin, commonly requiring between 5 and 7 days to produce maximum toxic effect in experimental animals. It has been shown that the LD50\text{LD}_{50}LD50​ for cylindrospermopsin decreases greatly between 24 hours and 5 days. The 24-hour LD50\text{LD}_{50}LD50​ for mice (i.p.) is 2 mg/kg, while the 5-6 day i.p. LD50\text{LD}_{50}LD50​ is 0.2 mg/kg (Ohtani et al. 1992, Terao 1994). The 5-day LD50\text{LD}_{50}LD50​ for mice by oral administration is approximately 6 mg/kg (Seawright et al. 1999).

A range of sub-chronic oral toxicity studies have demonstrated that the most sensitive responses in mice are in increased liver, kidney, and testis weights, together with a decrease in urine protein content. These studies can be used to derive the maximum no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for oral cell extracts of C. raciborskii or purified cylindrospermopsin.

The most detailed sub-chronic oral dosing study was undertaken by Humpage and Falconer (2003). In two trials, mice were exposed to various doses of cylindrospermopsin for 10-11 weeks. Body weights were significantly increased at low doses (30 and 60 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1) and decreased at high doses (432 and 657 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1). Liver and kidney weights were significantly increased at doses of 240 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1 and 60 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1, respectively. Serum bilirubin levels were significantly increased and bile acids significantly decreased at doses of 216 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1 and greater. Serum cholesterol levels were significantly increased at 30 and 60 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1. Urine total protein was significantly decreased at doses above 60 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1. In contrast to previous findings from studies using higher doses and/or shorter exposure times, the kidney rather than the liver appeared to be the more sensitive organ in this trial, although both were clearly affected.

Shaw et al. (2000) calculated a NOAEL of 50 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1 based on fatty infiltration of the liver. Reisner et al. (2004) reported increased serum cholesterol, changes in red blood cell membrane cholesterol, distortion of cell morphology and increased hematocrits in a 21-day oral exposure trial with male mice drinking water containing 600 μg L⁻¹ cylindrospermopsin (estimated daily cylindrospermopsin intake of 66 μg kg⁻¹). Sukenik et al. (2006) reported impacts from giving mice increasing concentrations of cylindrospermopsin in the drinking water over 42 weeks, ranging from initial doses of approximately 10 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1 to 58 μg kg−1^{-1}−1 d−1^{-1}−1 Relative kidney weights were significantly increased at 20 weeks whereas liver weights were significantly increased only at 42 weeks. Effects on cholesterol, red cell morphology and hematocrit were observed.

The variations in experimental design of these studies makes an interpretation of dose-response difficult, but overall these findings are in agreement with the 11 week trial described above, both in terms of adverse effects and dose levels producing them.

A NOAEL based on these studies above is estimated to be around 30 μg/kg body weight per day.

Derivation of health alert

The strength of data is insufficient to establish a guideline value. However, an initial health alert can be estimated using the results described above.

0.945 μg/L rounded to 1 μg/L=30 μg/kg bodyweight per day × 70 kg × 0.92 L/day × 1000\text{0.945 μg/L rounded to 1 μg/L} = \dfrac{\text{30 μg/kg bodyweight per day × 70 kg × 0.9}}{\text{2 L/day × 1000}}0.945 μg/L rounded to 1 μg/L=2 L/day × 100030 μg/kg bodyweight per day × 70 kg × 0.9​

where:

  • 30 mg/kg body weight per day is the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) from the 10 and 11 week ingestion studies with cylindrospermopsin in mice based on liver histopathology, body organ weight and serum enzyme level changes (Humpage and Falconer 2003);

  • 70kg is the average weight of an adult;

  • 0.9 is the proportion of total daily intake attributed to the consumption of water;

  • 2 L/day is the average amount of water consumed by an adult;

  • 1000 is the safety factor derived from extrapolation of an animal study to humans (10 for interspecies variability, 10 for intraspecies variability and 10 for limitations in the database, related particularly to the lack of data on chronic toxicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity).

In situations where C. raciborskii occurs in drinking water supplies and toxin monitoring data are unavailable, cell numbers may be used to provide a preliminary orientation to the potential hazard to public health. This type of assessment has been used for Microcystis aeruginosa. However, this is slightly more problematic for C. raciborskii, as, at any time, a significant proportion of cylindrospermopsin toxin may be extracellular and free in solution, and this cannot be accounted for in the assessment of cell counts from the raw water.

Nevertheless, in the case of C. raciborskii, local knowledge and experience can allow the development of local thresholds. For example, in Queensland both water and health authorities have extensive monitoring data and experience for a range of populations of toxic C. raciborskii (G McGregor, personal communication). Data from 23 reservoirs indicated that most of the cylindrospermopsin was found in the cell-bound fraction and that concentrations of approximately 1 mg/L were associated with cell concentrations in the range of 15,000-20,000 cells/mL, which is equivalent to a biovolume of 0.6-0.8 mm3/L\text{mm}^3\text{/L}mm3/L (based on a mean cell volume of C. raciborskii 42 mm3\text{mm}^3mm3). These numbers are indicative only and for health risk assessment, total toxin determination, including both intracellular and extracellular concentrations, is required.

Notification procedure

It is recommended that a notification procedure be developed by water and health authorities. A tiered framework should be considered. Initial notification to health authorities could be provided when numbers of C. raciborskii reach 30% of the density equivalent to 1 μg/L cylindrospermopsin (4,500 cells/mL; biovolume 0.2 mm3/L\text{mm}^3\text{/L}mm3/L), while an alert could be provided when cell numbers are equivalent to 1 μg/L cylindrospermopsin (15,000 cells/mL; biovolume 0.6 mm3/L\text{mm}^3\text{/L}mm3/L). For cylindrospermopsin-producing species other than C. raciborskii, notifications and alerts should be based on biovolumes.

In all cases, cell numbers should only be used as preliminary signals and as triggers for toxin testing to enable assessment of potential health risks.

References

Baker PD, Fabbro LD (2002). A Guide to the Identification of Common Blue-Green Algae (Cyanoprokaryotes) in Australian Freshwaters. CRCFE Identification Guide No. 25. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury.

Baker P, Humpage AR (1994). Toxicity associated with commonly occurring cyanobacteria in surface waters of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45:773-786.

Banker R, Teltsch B, Sukenik A, Carmeli S (2000). 7-epicylindrospermopsin, a toxic minor metabolite of the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon ovalisporum from Lake Kinneret, Israel. Journal of Natural Products 63(3):387-389.

Banker R, Carmeli S, Hadas O, Teltsch B, Porat R, Sukenik A (1997). Identification of cylindrospermopsin in the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Cyanophyceae) isolated from Lake Kinneret, Israel. Journal of Phycology, 33:613-616.

Byth S (1980). Palm Island mystery disease. Medical Journal of Australia, 2:40-42.

Chiswell RK, Shaw GR, Eaglesham GK, Smith MJ, Norris RL, Seawright AA, Moore MR (1999). Stability of cylindrospermopsin, the toxin from the cyanobacterium, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii: Effect of pH, temperature and sunlight on decomposition. Environmental Toxicology, 14:155-161.

Chorus I, Bartram J (eds) (1999). Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water. A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. E&FN Spon, London.

Eaglesham GK, Norris RL, Shaw GR, Smith MJ, Chiswell RK, Davis BD, Neville GR, Seawright AA, Moore MR (1999). Use of HPLC-MS/MS to monitor cylindrospermopsin, a blue-green algal toxin, for public health purposes. Environmental Toxicology, 14:151-154.

Falconer IR, Hardy SJ, Humpage AR, Froscio SM, Toizer GJ, Hawkins PR (1999). Hepatic and renal toxicity of the blue-green alga (cyanobacterium) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii in male Swiss albino mice. Environmental Toxicology, 14:143-150.

Falconer IR, Humpage AR (2006). Cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) toxins in water supplies: Cylindrospermopsin. Environmental Toxicology, 21:299-304.

Harada K, Ikuko O, Iwamoto K, Suzuki M, Watanabe M, Watanabe M, Terao K (1994). Isolation of cylindrospermopsin from a cyanobacterium Umezakia natans and its screening method. Toxicon, 32:73-84.

Hawkins PR, Runnegar MTC, Jackson ARB, Falconer IR (1985). Severe hepatotoxicity caused by the tropical cyanobacterium (blue-green alga), Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska) Seenaya and Subba Raju isolated from a domestic water supply reservoir. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 50:1292-1295.

Hotzel G, Croome R (1999). A Phytoplankton Methods Manual for Australian Freshwaters. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 22/99, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.

Humpage AR, Falconer IR (2003). Oral toxicity of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin in male Swiss albino mice: Determination of no observed adverse effect level for deriving a drinking water guideline value. Environmental Toxicology, 18:94–103.

New South Wales Office of Water (2009).The Murray River algal bloom. New South Wales Department of Climate Change and Water, Sydney, Australia.

Norris RL, Eaglesham GK, Pierens G, Shaw GR, Smith MJ, Chiswell RK, Seawright AA, Moore MR (1999). Deoxycylindrospermopsin, an analog of cylindrospermopsin from Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii. Environmental Toxicology, 14:163-165.

Ohtani I, Moore RE, Runnegar MTC (1992). Cylindrospermopsin: A potent hepatotoxin from the blue-green alga Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii. Journal of the American Chemistry Society, 114:7941-7942.

Reisner M, Carmeli S, Werman M, Sukenik A. (2004). The cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin inhibits pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and alters cholesterol distribution in mice. Toxicological Sciences, 82(2):620-627.

Saker ML, Thomas AD, Norton JH (1999). Cattle mortality attributed to the toxic cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii in an outback region of North Queensland. Environmental Toxicology, 14:179-182.

Seawright AA, Nolan CC, Shaw GR, Chiswell RK, Norris RL, Moore MR, Smith MJ (1999). The oral toxicity for mice of the tropical cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska). Environmental Toxicology, 14:135-142.

Shaw GR, Sukenik A, Livne A, Chiswell RK, Smith MJ, Seawright AA, Norris RL, Eaglesham GK, Moore MR (1999). Blooms of the cylindrospermopsin containing cyanobacterium, Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Forti) in newly constructed lakes, Queensland, Australia. Environmental Toxicology, 14:167-177.

Shaw GR, Seawright AA, Moore MR. (2000). Toxicology and human health implications of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin. In: Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins in Perspective at the Turn of the Millennium. Proceedings of the Xth International IUPAC symposium on Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins, 21-25 May 2000, Guaruja, Brazil. IUPAC and AOAC International, pp 435-443.

Smith MJ, Shaw GR, Eaglesham GK, Ho L, Brookes JD (2007). Elucidating the factors influencing the biodegradation of cylindrospermopsin in drinking water sources. Environmental Toxicology 23:413-421.

Sukenik A, Reisner M, Carmeli S, Werman M (2006). Oral toxicity of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermospin in mice: Long-term exposure to low doses. Environmental Toxicology, 21:575-582.

Terao K, Ohmori S, Igarashi K, Ohtani I, Watanabe MG, Harada K-I, Ito E, Watanabe M (1994). Electron microscopic studies on experimental poisoning in mice induced by cylindrospermopsin isolated from blue-green alga Umezakia natans. Toxicon, 32:833-843.

PreviousCyanobacteria and their toxinsNextMicrocystins

Last updated 6 months ago

MDBA (Murray Darling Basin Authority) (2010) River Murray algal blooms. Available at .

https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/the-algal-management-strategy.pdf